Free tool
Score any creator across the 5 audience-authenticity signals brands miss most often. No login. The risk score is calibrated against the creator's tier — a 2% engagement rate on a 5K nano gets flagged where the same rate on a 5M mega doesn't.
Risk score
20 / 100
Low risk — no major flags surfaced
Engagement vs tier
100
1.22% ER · healthy is 2%+ for this tier
Comment density
0
2.00 comments per 100 likes · healthy is 2-5
Foreign audience %
0
15% in bot-farm geos · healthy is <20%
Follower-growth shape
0
No reported spike
Audience demo match
0
Audience demo matches content topic
This is the manual version.SpendVet auto-pulls every signal — engagement, audience location, demographics, growth shape, comment quality — from just a creator's @handle, then scores it across all of the above. 25 free lookups, no card.
No tool can. Even paid forensic audits give a probability score, not a yes/no. What this checker does is surface the strongest signals brands miss in manual review — engagement-to-tier mismatch, comment density, audience location vs creator location — and combine them into a single risk score.
Because the most common bot pattern is a US/UK-based creator with 30%+ followers from countries where bot farms operate cheaply (Brazil, India, Indonesia, Turkey). That audience-creator location mismatch is one of the highest-signal red flags.
This is the manual-entry version — you enter the signals you can see on the public profile. SpendVet (the product) auto-pulls all of these from just a handle. This page is the free educational version.
Two things to check: (1) is the audience-location flag triggered because the creator is genuinely international (a French creator with 40% Brazilian audience because they vacation there often, for example)? (2) Did they recently buy ads that drove low-engagement followers? Both are non-fraud explanations. Use this score as a "prompt to investigate," not a verdict.